
Link to this Image.









Vincent Childress wrote an article about hydroelectricity. A hydroelectric dam is constructed with non-organic soil and rocks. The water goes to the passageway, which is located inside the dam. Then the water will go through the dam to the scroll case, which makes water flow around the turbine. The water will turn the turbine that is connected to the generator, and it will produce a magnetic field that produces electricity. He asked a question, "Is Hydroelectricity Green," (Childress, 2008). It made me think that hydroelectricity is good for our environment. He discussed that hydroelectricity is green because it does not produce any pollution. He said that hydroelectricity does not produce any air pollution unlike other sources of energy. Coal and nuclear are major source of energy that are used in the United States, but these sources of energy produce pollutions that are not good for our environment. Air pollutions that are produced by coal can cause people to have lung cancer, asthma, and other diseases. Government must think of the side effects that can happen when they are using energy sources. A hydroelectric dam is also built to prevent floods in some communities that are located downstream. Although hydroelectricity does not produce any pollution, it also has some disadvantages that experts are worrying about. Experts say that huge dams are more unstable that the small dams. Experts are afraid that large dams might be vulnerable to earthquakes, (Childress, 2008). Some communities started to experience flooding due to some spill from the dam. Some issues were resolved by the government. After the dam was built, some fish are unable to swim up to the streams to lay their eggs. The operational dams made use of stairs channels around the dam, so fish could lay their eggs upstream. There is also a problem about hydroelectricity producing electricity. Because of the limited water, the hydroelectricity was unable to produce 100 percent of electricity at a time. People cannot depend on the hydroelectricity because it will not operate with low water, and conductors, who operate the generators, cannot predict the rainfall level. Basically, Childress is saying that hydroelectricity is good for our environment, but there is no energy source that does not have negative side effects from it.


This essay, "Where I Lived, and What I Lived for" by Henry David Thoreau is about how he wanted to live a simple life. He went to the woods to find out what life is about. He wanted to do things that are very useful in living, "I wish to practice resignation, unless it is quite neccessary," (Thoreau, 2007). Thoreau wanted to give up many things unless it is essential for him to live in this world. I can somehow see the connection of Thoreau's essay to my blog's topic. He wanted to reduce his works to its proportion to save some energy. he did not want to waste any of his energy; therefore he did not want to use up a lot of things that involves electricity. Unlike in our generation, most people multi-task almost every day, instead of working one thing at a time, they are doing many things at the same time. Working many things at the same time can waste a lot of energy and electricity, which Thoreau was trying to point out in his essay. He wanted for himself and for other people to live simple and try to do one thing at a time, which can help us and to conserve electricity.
Image link
Thoreau, Henry D. (2007). Where I Lived, What I Lived for. In S. Cohen, 50 Essays (pp. 424- 430). Boston: Bedford St. Martin's.

